From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D8A3858012 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:24:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B5D8A3858012 Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p132so18453630oif.9 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:24:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jFT26kh27aocFAQUpb00KqgJlCwLgART7p2RuPFar/A=; b=YCn4xXNLPJD80Ck8s71LBIxRGVXexJgeIa15QnRyZzm4QLUcURqPW6tu8YnISEdDoE HnLEuMxElFNhnreWjD52M/gKKnunW4LCm6uxa9Uubg09rtABpWn9h2gr/tCT3nP8RxAs p/AP3F0fWYVVVgdoxZ02GTgv0oo9EGBnHNmvKQIOw/ZtN86/4U1rUwcp/l6MayqAdCgF xM7lJQSHZQpLVGgkeTH+oWPDL30U/HtA1j2kJaBcBCfupH6PmqMZ7+z++0fKcYsJK1Np bI+GotjqfY1bcoiGV+4MG7oen1/QgFnht7uSbhWMs9IKrqJTd45qMy9qUpww/jcz/ADW M9xA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9JexQYf0iycmI+fu/9tchY6LJoXiKnruTf67dKmr+I5zHcgRYy lCGCWp24DIDAdCsQn7HuQ9rZcQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1u7lvzqKKZ+Dqb5aQI8Ahsxis0OlRywStwJkN/lwuKGP8Kxv2Zlzr3w5Jdot2EtAv84Qwbs5A== X-Received: by 2002:aca:aa89:0:b0:33a:c295:f49a with SMTP id t131-20020acaaa89000000b0033ac295f49amr422306oie.213.1658867040992; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2804:431:c7cb:8ded:8925:49f1:c550:ee7d? ([2804:431:c7cb:8ded:8925:49f1:c550:ee7d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p30-20020a0568708a1e00b0010d898363a9sm7929695oaq.55.2022.07.26.13.23.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 17:23:16 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.0.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH] elf.h: Add ELFCOMPRESS_ZSTD Content-Language: en-US To: Fangrui Song , Carlos O'Donell Cc: Florian Weimer , Cary Coutant , Fangrui Song via Libc-alpha References: <20220708233233.2554110-1-maskray@google.com> <871qus8cuw.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <20220722230837.qea3d33gvji5kxtl@google.com> From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto Organization: Linaro In-Reply-To: <20220722230837.qea3d33gvji5kxtl@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:24:04 -0000 On 22/07/22 20:08, Fangrui Song via Libc-alpha wrote: > On 2022-07-18, Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha wrote: >> On 7/11/22 00:58, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: >>> * Fangrui Song via Libc-alpha: >>> >>>> I wish that the macro definition can catch up the upcoming >>>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.36 [1], so that >>>> projects can expect the value ELFCOMPRESS_ZSTD from elf.h. >>>> The projects may choose to define the macro themselves, >>>> but having the definition in an earlier release seems a good idea >>>> anyway, and it the glibc definition makes it clearer ELFCOMPRESS_ZSTD >>>> is standard and vendors can start adding support. >>>> >>>> [1]: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-July/140352.html >>>> ("Release of glibc 2.36 in 1 month! Please add blockers and desirable for release.") >>> >>> This looks quite backportable to me, so it should not be a release >>> blocker.  It's only a blocker if we apply the patch today, then we'd >>> have to wait until the gABI assignment actually happens as expected. >> >> Agreed. This is a NACK from me as the RM until the gABI assignment happens. >> > > Cary has accepted this value: https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/satyPkuMisk/m/KwTF_U8rBAAJ > (Thanks!) > > Ed Maste from FreeBSD wants to define this in FreeBSD. > > Shall we define it for glibc as well? :) I think this is ok, we are already fixing bad designs so we most likely need more time for testing.