From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.68])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30543858D28
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 22:58:04 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E30543858D28
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.ucla.edu
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cs.ucla.edu
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3BC1600AF;
 Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)
 with ESMTP id gpDmnLP0uKok; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56BC1600B0;
 Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id wSd8XiWD6LiZ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [100.115.92.201] (cpe-172-91-119-151.socal.res.rr.com
 [172.91.119.151])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C6081600AF;
 Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f3ded3da-7d0a-cbe6-4635-28615584e5c1@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:58:01 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Subject: Re: [swbz 29035] mktime vs non-DST
Content-Language: en-US
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, carlos@redhat.com
References: <xnmtc15g6x.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
In-Reply-To: <xnmtc15g6x.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 22:58:05 -0000

On 8/18/22 15:40, DJ Delorie wrote:
> So while I agree that gnulib's code is more consistent, and thus better,
> I'm still going to argue the other side until we've covered all the
> options

Not sure what is meant by "all the options".

Perhaps see what FreeBSD etc. do with your examples? That might be helpful.