From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-75360-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 57014 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2016 14:03:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 56927 invoked by uid 89); 30 Nov 2016 14:03:27 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f180.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization
         :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=swdOsjPi+81F/P2g1DD2jHhcoKCCTZhg7swm+9VNLYc=;
        b=DGSAeYqPgvzH5WTf3UHnr1fPg3+Z6SjJIHuphtUVbu6xhblJR0dm6d4AJNQZHJ/uag
         ZnZDZrtQsk+BR15CQsPldsxb3TTpy6ddVi9dv76/jHL4ydLSsVuREGphEghCkC+dE6Jw
         2yisifXWx9hjuJm/79KLWqU0L2DjZMlqgX7YVfxhHihIsII+VY9FsVAtfA1B2GuyecMl
         rOhcscBZgfYaHay2WU0Noz/OMzAdfXofvgAtnEP5HgHYcnhEGAdRqrQKWusGoF4NhXrQ
         qcfuiUFS0EP20wd/Of0XbcneMenlVb+/gCARGDYliUnax9Bpg1fXPnjBx2Z5PJAgpF/a
         +GHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00vsKq3C61bDSH07QPvDArvp6v6bRDpy9yf6x3dazCAecDF97mPfqsMqrP3C6y8Hx31
X-Received: by 10.55.16.147 with SMTP id 19mr28585860qkq.255.1480514595298;
        Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Last Responder Wins in Patchwork?
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
 Rical Jasan <ricaljasan@pacific.net>
References: <3f3c6679-dedc-a684-8f90-854a7428ec5e@pacific.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611301255370.3647@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <f4336d23-eebe-caf9-fbb4-5845dca81390@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:03:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611301255370.3647@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg01113.txt.bz2

On 11/30/2016 07:56 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Rical Jasan wrote:
> 
>> Why does this say I'm the submitter?
>>
>> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/12829/
> 
> Because the message it is based on is one where you included a patch.  
> Note the "I've attached the beginnings of how I would approach it" in the 
> first message shown.
 
Mark it RFC if that's what is is, and then re-post a new patch
under a new thread if that's the way you want to go.

https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.