From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19412 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2018 12:32:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19403 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2018 12:32:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=wrappers X-HELO: mail-qk0-f193.google.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HUPYlK7Fv1TQUjWCODsWpOdpduOQjEEl4Ggro8AiI0Y=; b=T7/6rWIc/ES3Q8gHMzDjD4SH1k/u6PB6p08dNCxcudjkxjGaX76XfRvpHiUHLgwrNS 3Cv1DzeLaKbCiUpupa4dNtncoCn2Y2kwZxFtu5TLhhk5kN3nC31SGR8eQk8RXP+EvA2u DG8izbb0IN8aNP38WusdNdc0kn1VgC8jRFUjk= Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h To: Joseph Myers , Carlos O'Donell Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Florian Weimer References: <1517591084-11347-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <203a3def-74d0-fa66-9792-a587a089a359@linaro.org> <46c7b370-f98d-30a3-9aac-c5e2c5d5e1d0@linaro.org> <00cbaea3-d979-d766-58b1-a4b0822ca678@redhat.com> From: Adhemerval Zanella Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:32:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2 On 19/07/2018 18:26, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> Yes, I'd like to see Intel CET, C11 threads, and malloc hook removal land >> in this release. >> >> It seems to me like ISO C threads.h is ready, were there any more objections? >> >> Have we double checked with Joseph? > > I have not reviewed the details of the patches, but do not object to > inclusion in 2.28 if the patches can be reviewed and committed within the > next day, given that they were proposed well in advance of the freeze and > have already gone through a few reviews. > I think the patchset is in good shape overall, the only missing part without revision is '[PATCH v8 4/8] nptl: Add C11 threads cnd_* functions' but it should be simple since it is just wrappers around internal nptl calls. The only missing piece is Racal has asked to fold the manual contents chapter in threads.text. I will sort this out today.