From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F20DC3858C39 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:24:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F20DC3858C39 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: tonyk) with ESMTPSA id 9E3501F41F5A Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 15:24:27 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] futex: splitup and waitv syscall Content-Language: en-US To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bigeasy@linutronix.de, kernel@collabora.com, krisman@collabora.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net, arnd@arndb.de, dvhart@infradead.org References: <20210915140710.596174479@infradead.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Almeida?= In-Reply-To: <20210915140710.596174479@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:24:37 -0000 Às 11:07 de 15/09/21, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > Hi, > > Neither Thomas nor myself much liked that futex2.c nor do we think that CONFIG_ > symbol makes much sense. > > However, futex.c is a wee bit long and splitting it up makes sense. So I've > taken the liberty to replace your initial patch with 15 of my own and then > rebased the remaining patches on top of that. > > Thomas, does something like this work for you? > I tested this patchset: - On top of a full distro - Using futex kselftests - Running glibc's nptl tests, all 387 passed It seems that things are working as expected. You can add my Reviewed-by: André Almeida for patches 01 - 15.