From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-74841-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 115421 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2016 20:06:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 115409 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2016 20:06:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=glibc_2.xx, GLIBC_2xx, glibc_2xx, UD:GLIBC_2.xx
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f50.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id
         :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=xvf2Ykq6SoTkwWedpnz4ibS4Pbu5l6lQ9O9MjxSJEYE=;
        b=cPL/uLVQ7a4rwt4o/SFrl0EeBrQhpVq5DQtXaz8jEvts9TjKx20I3wkOGgK2Y/3NBN
         KqzPfcKbA5+iN9BmBgTPY7dBj5v5iSa/2nkVsf+ltmgVH/ywLv0zfa35Q4h7TpjOq60L
         ouBfHH2VCfKi26UtH+11x8oNv20e9n5M1IgBf+EzgHS2WbLZAIGi+N5riCoHujRxZoAv
         yASFT8NWLlhktkLIzpVH2oHSsoJ7/G53gAJPnylp7qev/C8reyGOHJetmv/QCd/VdsgT
         4E0+ubxZYzlEtkoGkNBq1Jl3mGMvy6AAo7LNL1PTnLkChnarf3RR2cH3o24/URrUgUa4
         ABnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc+8ifeJ/F/VAd16ZXEBWVp8ILFHMUAKU1C15jFi/6p1XrYqyjiTphBsN550vspjQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.153.10 with SMTP id b10mr11543711wme.103.1479326810806;
        Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] explicit_bzero v5
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <20161115155509.12692-1-zackw@panix.com>
 <fad796dc-3ba6-5cc1-f546-81aedaf5d1f2@twiddle.net>
 <500cef03-f7e2-f152-660d-438b08ac1f45@panix.com>
Cc: fweimer@redhat.com
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Message-ID: <f6b66994-3065-0e3b-87ce-97cb64db6426@twiddle.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:06:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <500cef03-f7e2-f152-660d-438b08ac1f45@panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00594.txt.bz2

On 11/16/2016 03:45 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> (If I were to make the public declaration in string.h redirect to
> __explicit_bzero, then clearly it ought to be a GLIBC_2.xx export rather
> than a GLIBC_PRIVATE export.  But, as I'll go into more elsewhere, I'm
> not convinced that's actually a good idea.)

Ah, that's exactly what I thought we were doing.

So, yes, without a string.h redirect this would seem to be a case for 
GLIBC_PRIVATE.


r~