From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-107677-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 61546 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2019 19:18:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 61536 invoked by uid 89); 3 Dec 2019 19:18:48 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=scenarios, H*f:sk:GmOs_bW, H*MI:sk:GmOs_bW, H*f:sk:NJ5mw@m
X-HELO: mail-qt1-f196.google.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=linaro.org; s=google;
        h=subject:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=yQIiyW9Aot6Wr6KSBWUCcSXuNytaoZKx6vl2lqzpWMo=;
        b=VYol9pbY64IjcSt1iIedsZuT3pZBQsJBN95wsFOpfRS93yNj7Nb1P2TUV4sNsiRzMr
         6UKKJOYXt4xXiInxgiCkwgbzFwlcc48mATvQpB90qMHspDpcltvtcU6mWlgyxZPy49sP
         wTgrVbRNahZALnRsDmInLBd1fLyBLdr8n3Og62nYMngdji7Nnf6EQpwFeFDdXBxXIHWt
         ofJCl50HTKvdm/w7JA+pjQtjNvb2qP7G49fH8jOsGHqhOEjrNEyTavDFJvPgfLXVketb
         0mbNkX8vABEO0IOCwA6xYP/3eCcHoJvASSIZz78mHP/gDX/KhvNsxIPr6HF8ZGUbjUGy
         NrAQ==
Return-Path: <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] linux: Use waitid on wait4 if __NR_wait4 is not
 defined
To: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
References: <20191114144704.19002-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
 <20191114144704.19002-5-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
 <ae1017d0-906c-7e76-b2e8-00f5f67e3281@linaro.org>
 <CAKmqyKOdTjQVMBeJM6p2rKNZSF+EF9WqYditZJ91FNapV4uSUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <a0b3de47-8f1b-e737-02bf-a1adeeb8b2d2@linaro.org>
 <CAKmqyKNOk_EPAo5Cr=2qUyVwEEGnRXRXwEm4oGVXUPd==NJ5mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <21e43b69-28a4-2d38-1faa-a4432f3cf255@linaro.org>
 <d5c03878-404a-888a-a9df-a491858b5de4@linaro.org>
 <CAKmqyKMCjZD7rAX+FJoKq894sBhf7pjmfCh+j=GmOs_bWK1WDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <f76a4ece-0a6c-e1b0-d47b-56dc9503aac8@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 19:18:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKmqyKMCjZD7rAX+FJoKq894sBhf7pjmfCh+j=GmOs_bWK1WDg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2



On 03/12/2019 15:58, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 4:42 AM Adhemerval Zanella
> <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25/11/2019 09:39, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>
>>> So it seems that __ASSUME_WAITID_PID0_P_PGID should be a safe call to
>>> avoid such theoretical scenarios.  I will rework how the flag is used
>>> to mimic other assume usage where newer kernel version undef the flag,
>>> so it should be simpler to remove it once the minimum kernel is lifted.
>>>
>>
>> In fact I think change the __ASSUME_WAITID_PID0_P_PGID won't be much
>> a improvement
> 
> Any update on this series?

I am working on a libpthread-compat.c patch I plan to update, so I can
rebase against it.