From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76B0D3858C5E for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 08:56:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 76B0D3858C5E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1680512174; bh=5zo4yF1aOUnp9wSoNH5rkJRZziKfec87bKCvEf9anPQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=axSiTvgbOgkj645g60seD7YT1/p96iFGn6xZlH0hCCct9OSbo8EDN/O4Ddtv4X3OO XPYk5Oa5ohB3p9YJ0DqhJUuehZQy1DHrD1Uou1YZNGA9NAYGUxLHkspGtk4xHjw4rl vFJpswIfVjJMwJcjJphmLgk+Wsph9a6nIzwpodl0= Received: from [192.168.124.11] (unknown [113.140.11.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED20565A90; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 04:56:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Modify some member names in mcontext_t and ucontext_t structs to align them with the kernel. From: Xi Ruoyao To: caiyinyu , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, Chenghua Xu , =?gb2312?Q?=CD=F5=BA=E9=BB=A2?= , lixing@loongson.cn Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 16:56:10 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20230324062510.1812367-1-caiyinyu@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, 2023-03-31 at 11:52 +0800, caiyinyu wrote: /* snip */ > Your plan caused fails in glibc conform tests. Let me try something... > We wanted to inform you that we are aware that the proposed=20 > modification[1] will affect the public API. However, since LoongArch=20 > Musl has not yet been released Then why not change the Musl instead? It's not released so you won't break existing code. --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University