From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8647 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2017 11:17:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8608 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2017 11:17:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*ucla.edu, interest, hear, tomorrow X-HELO: homiemail-a52.g.dreamhost.com Subject: Re: libc-2.25.90.pot From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Adhemerval Zanella , Benno Schulenberg , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Paul Eggert References: <8b9b4e60-f580-e56a-26bc-adb7192ba779@sourceware.org> <6e7f7602-3536-2edb-0cf4-e66a948fdb71@translationproject.org> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 19 July 2017 07:19 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Wednesday 19 July 2017 06:58 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: >> I think for glibc, since we support C99 intmax_t printf format, we can >> just use %jd instead: >> >> * timezone/zic.c (PRIdLINENO): Remove macro. >> (verror): Use %jd instead of PRIdLINENO. > > Fine with me, but I'd like to hear from Joseph/Paul too if they have any > context from the tz project that may make this a bad idea. In the interest of unblocking the translation team, lets wait till tomorrow and then commit if there are no objections. The more I look at the change the more it looks like future-proofing and not relevant to a current problem. If the future-proofing is necessary, we can get it back in 2.26.90 in a way that does not break translation strings. Siddhesh