public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>,
	 adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, siddhesh@sourceware.org,
	 libc-alpha@sourceware.org, carlos@redhat.com
Subject: Re: freeze for the upcoming glibc 2.38 release
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 02:43:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd0754c8228b3e5ca997e8821fe751c6f0ae87fd.camel@xry111.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1817162.X513TT2pbd@pinacolada>

On Thu, 2023-07-06 at 20:28 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel via Libc-alpha
wrote:

> - July 6-11, "slushy ABI freeze"
>   * No new ABI additions.
>   * ABI corrections should be reviewed, RM approval not required.
>   * Avoid any changes that require action by the ports (including all
>     that require ulps regeneration)
>   * Bug fixes.
>   * Monday patch review switches to reviewing critical bug list and
>     ABI issues.
> 
>   We still have two "desirables" on the wiki page, 
>   * "Add clone3 support for multiple architectures" - can we wrap this
> up
>     safely next week?
>     https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=16730
>   * "Flip defaults for some security-relevant build configuration
> flags"
>     https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=21908
>     The series consists of 4 patches. 2 (stack-protector-strong), 3 
>     (bind-now) and 4 (disable-crypt) should be uncontroversial.
>     ## The list thread on 1 (autoconf-2.71) ended without a clear
>        conclusion. What's the status here? ##
> 
>   Anything else?

May I add
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=22006 here?
The reason:

- It's trivial.
- Applying it here will stop GCC analyzer developers from implementing
these as special cases.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-06 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-06 18:28 Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-06 18:43 ` Xi Ruoyao [this message]
2023-07-08 17:42   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-09 12:25     ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-07-07  7:29 ` Paul Zimmermann
2023-07-08 17:44   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-09  7:12     ` Paul Zimmermann
2023-07-07 10:18 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-07-08 17:46   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-07 12:12 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-07-07 21:21   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-08 17:51     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-07 21:40   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-08 17:48     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-10 15:45       ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-07-10 16:06 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-07-13 21:35   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2023-07-14  2:24     ` Noah Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd0754c8228b3e5ca997e8821fe751c6f0ae87fd.camel@xry111.site \
    --to=xry111@xry111.site \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=siddhesh@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).