public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
To: michael.hudson@canonical.com
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] build-many-glibcs: Add a rv64gcbv-on-rv64gc/lp64d sub-variant
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:12:52 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mhng-4d3ee592-9f72-4950-b658-ad13293b01e7@palmer-ri-x1c9a> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8wqtekk4fE2aeCTPj47AynCKq_f+ExFLPv6FFNXB8jw6P-aQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:01:31 PDT (-0700), michael.hudson@canonical.com wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 07:28, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately I don't think we can drop support for the other base ISAs:
>> the distros appear to be targeting rv64gc and that's the only common
>> base for most hardware that's out there.
>>
>
> This is certainly the case for Ubuntu for now but I certainly hope that by
> 26.04 we are able to be a bit more aggressive here, fwiw.

That'd be awesome.  Any idea if something like this would help?  

I think we're all a bit worried about being stuck with a very small 
baseline and thus a bunch of vendor-specific behavior.  That's certainly 
the way things are trending right now in RISC-V land, it's already super 
complicated to manage and it looks like it's going to get worse before 
it gets better.

If we can pick up some extra testing burden now as a way to reduce 
fragmentation then it's probably a win in the long run, even if we have 
to go through a few generations of this before things calm down.  If 
you're planning on moving to something completely different, though, 
then maybe it's not worth the extra builds.

> Cheers,
> mwh

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-16 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15 19:24 Palmer Dabbelt
2024-04-15 20:05 ` enh
2024-04-15 20:22   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-04-25  5:11     ` Jeff Law
2024-04-15 20:24 ` Darius Rad
2024-04-15 21:36   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-04-16 14:55     ` Darius Rad
2024-04-16 16:04       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-04-16 20:41         ` Darius Rad
2024-04-16 21:06           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-04-16  7:01 ` Michael Hudson-Doyle
2024-04-16 18:12   ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
2024-04-17  9:46     ` Florian Weimer
2024-04-23  3:08     ` Michael Hudson-Doyle
2024-04-17 10:26   ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mhng-4d3ee592-9f72-4950-b658-ad13293b01e7@palmer-ri-x1c9a \
    --to=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=michael.hudson@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).