From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To: fw@deneb.enyo.de
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, l.stelmach@samsung.com,
schwab@suse.de, maskray@google.com, fweimer@redhat.com,
adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, joseph@codesourcery.com,
binutils@sourceware.org, m.pikula@partner.samsung.com,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com, k.lewandowsk@samsung.com
Subject: Re: global pointer gets overwritten with dlopen(3) on RISC-V
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 06:47:09 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mhng-b599b554-275f-4115-a48a-a939ddb4a580@palmer-ri-x1c9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wn1dfurd.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
On Fri, 12 May 2023 08:13:10 PDT (-0700), fw@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
> * Lukasz Stelmach via Libc-alpha:
>
>> We've got a program (the testee) written in C that we test with another
>> one (a testing harness, the tester) written in C++ with gtest. So far,
>> so good. To make the testing and inspection of the internal state of the
>> testee easier the tester does not start the testee as a separate process
>> but loads it with dlopen(3) and calls the testee's main() function.
>
> We specifically disallow this in current glibc because it does not
> work in general—unless the application is really loadable as a shared
> object (compiled as PIC and linked with -shared).
Just popping back up here, as we got lost in the ABI discussions and
were talking about it during the glibc patchwork call: essentially it
boils down to us needing a more concrete reproducer for the bug.
If GP is used in a shared object then we've got a bug somewhere,
probably the linker. There's been some debate about what things like
position independent mean in RISC-V land, so it's entirely possible
there's something odd floating around here. If you can reproduce that
it's probably a bug, but probably a LD/LLD bug.
It sounds like there are no known bugs in glibc related to loading
executables via dlopen(), as that doesn't work for any port due to a
host of reasons (GP is just one of them). We might have some bug
floating around, RISC-V specific or otherwise, though. If you have a
reproducer for that then we can try and sort things out.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-15 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20230512142114eucas1p112d969a89ad2480a0c10a532bd6d8440@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-05-12 14:21 ` Lukasz Stelmach
2023-05-12 15:13 ` Florian Weimer
2023-05-15 13:47 ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20230516065316eucas1p17bffcd25209bb441b9a9f4d263aa8b3c@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-05-16 6:53 ` Lukasz Stelmach
2023-05-16 7:59 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-05-17 0:11 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-12 19:50 ` Fangrui Song
2023-05-12 20:11 ` Florian Weimer
2023-05-12 20:33 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-12 21:09 ` Fangrui Song
2023-05-12 21:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-12 22:34 ` Fangrui Song
2023-05-12 22:47 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-13 0:05 ` Fangrui Song
2023-05-13 0:35 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-16 3:56 ` Fangrui Song
2023-05-16 22:51 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-16 23:21 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-12 20:35 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mhng-b599b554-275f-4115-a48a-a939ddb4a580@palmer-ri-x1c9 \
--to=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=k.lewandowsk@samsung.com \
--cc=l.stelmach@samsung.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=m.pikula@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).