From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <schwab@suse.de>
Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4F03858D3C
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue,  8 Nov 2022 13:28:17 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EE4F03858D3C
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de
Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134])
	by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C151F6E6;
	Tue,  8 Nov 2022 13:28:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa;
	t=1667914097; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=ZPx6ErDjkEf0vt79YtzVg6+O04PsV1OyCkDTCYpY5Tc=;
	b=ehatiCayxJ+U+9ixGdoX4HffkUjHvqq4nRhLcxCdltWsEYf8DScwh1lKDt0KArp7/jauWh
	Lrmo+xyLWHUfqBBEU3OuEt5zcfAnf0PGBoYVwzLE4LqXEbuY+0+uq1gRFy1WJXgXfaRx+F
	yYww+MH0WY1ZBjMAbKl3NNkUhSx0Y9Q=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;
	s=susede2_ed25519; t=1667914097;
	h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=ZPx6ErDjkEf0vt79YtzVg6+O04PsV1OyCkDTCYpY5Tc=;
	b=SpXnEBow/iUZSmOnkeFvqWgEjxIgAfEU6OUAD2LAijvb4wzSIN3MJ4cUHz2sJSSnTVBnU7
	LM0SW/fZFzwdarBw==
Received: from hawking.suse.de (unknown [10.168.4.11])
	by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AAE2C141;
	Tue,  8 Nov 2022 13:28:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by hawking.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 17005)
	id 7767244039C; Tue,  8 Nov 2022 14:28:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org,  Kabe <skabe@vega.pgw.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Linux: Add ppoll fortify symbol for 64 bit time_t
 (BZ# 29746)
References: <20221108131525.1070162-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
X-Yow: Is this BOISE??
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 14:28:16 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20221108131525.1070162-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
	(Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Tue, 8 Nov 2022 10:15:25 -0300")
Message-ID: <mvm8rkld18v.fsf@suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

On Nov 08 2022, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

> diff --git a/include/sys/poll.h b/include/sys/poll.h
> index f904e21f89..af032048e4 100644
> --- a/include/sys/poll.h
> +++ b/include/sys/poll.h
> @@ -2,16 +2,22 @@
>  # include <io/sys/poll.h>
>  
>  #ifndef _ISOMAC
> +#include <include/struct___timespec64.h>
> +
>  extern int __poll (struct pollfd *__fds, unsigned long int __nfds,
>  		   int __timeout);
>  libc_hidden_proto (__poll)
> +
>  libc_hidden_proto (ppoll)
>  
>  # if __TIMESIZE == 64
> -#  define __ppoll64 __ppoll
> +#  define ppoll64 ppoll
> +#  define __ppoll64 ppoll
> +#  define __ppoll64_chk __ppoll_chk
>  # else
>  # include <time.h>
>  # include <signal.h>
> +# define ppoll64 __ppoll64

Why do you need that indirection through the ppoll64 macro?

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."