From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=Wgoo=DT=suse.de=schwab@sourceware.org>
Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6213858D37
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Wed,  2 Aug 2023 13:16:26 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DF6213858D37
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de
Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134])
	by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC8B1F7AB;
	Wed,  2 Aug 2023 13:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa;
	t=1690982186; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=gtPNOR1pMLPqZZJ6IG+JJSUK5fxMV5IP/K187b4DdgQ=;
	b=TqR1ct6/IQaiGRgBDg52Q9X42LyI5TO6UEv7n7haZK1LuxUX+xvzbXh5MF+n4UwALcwcUv
	XiITCpgwt4CTOxN5krQxtT58cxYWwhPjqpTDGMWwR4aC7VsHMf7noDvhcgkrvO3MfDyJV5
	0AJk+WtFm3blkkJXv5GcGw4oapgFMg4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;
	s=susede2_ed25519; t=1690982186;
	h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=gtPNOR1pMLPqZZJ6IG+JJSUK5fxMV5IP/K187b4DdgQ=;
	b=urZp9r9KddhDeVeqHrY3EvNvZSTYmD31APZ3tzIjAnoBvSeWTR1xfD8gZBWDAapsVX8QPq
	mFaYkf1LoTmX2GCw==
Received: from hawking.nue2.suse.org (unknown [10.168.4.11])
	by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108A02C149;
	Wed,  2 Aug 2023 13:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by hawking.nue2.suse.org (Postfix, from userid 17005)
	id F2C864AAD16; Wed,  2 Aug 2023 15:16:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nscd: Do not rebuild getaddrinfo (bug 30709)
In-Reply-To: <87sf924zqx.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer via
	Libc-alpha's message of "Tue, 01 Aug 2023 16:13:26 +0200")
References: <87sf924zqx.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
X-Yow: Go on, EMOTE!  I was RAISED on thought balloons!!
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 15:16:25 +0200
Message-ID: <mvma5v9k2ja.fsf@suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

Isn't the point of the rebuild that nscd's getaddrinfo does not try to
contact nscd?

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."