From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E9C3858D1E for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:08:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F3E9C3858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDB81F8EF; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:08:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1663596539; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WOExLAdgeChfndkccbNTYXtE1MJl3OIQALvr9bC1vk0=; b=CJ+SuTLX+raFIjSIIWz3OqPvgsjfTNGbvv6Ln6tRtotzp1vMLpKIA+VpRka0NIubnmNmNJ tdUk4hQ3eefUItDs47ZnVmOm7e6bDuBEtG7v7WzqG/xu2egEVnmXJt5qama9TYC5ShsMmX 2xebdgDSRumGfTrOA0UHlIK551rNgvU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1663596539; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WOExLAdgeChfndkccbNTYXtE1MJl3OIQALvr9bC1vk0=; b=lBMnMSNkfvzReQBD2mhMyhWGH4LvnDnMg5T9GdYn007Qs15VjyIWceYPlTkyVm+KPp06c9 rDvqZAE1IYI5inCg== Received: from hawking.suse.de (unknown [10.168.4.11]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1337C2C141; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hawking.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 17005) id D52C544021C; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 16:08:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha Cc: Florian Weimer , Helge Deller Subject: Re: [PATCH] gconv: Use 64-bit interfaces in gconv_parseconfdir (bug 29583) References: <87czbrj037.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> X-Yow: I guess you guys got BIG MUSCLES from doing too much STUDYING! Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 16:08:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87czbrj037.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:27:08 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sep 19 2022, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > It's possible that inode numbers are outside the 32-bit range. > The existing code only handles the in-libc case correctly, and > still uses the legacy interfaces when building iconv. Ok. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."