From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-107845-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 108434 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2019 12:53:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 108425 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2019 12:53:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:mvmlfrl, H*f:sk:2c6ca3f, H*f:sk:mvmeexd, H*i:sk:38b8e5b
X-HELO: mx1.suse.de
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix __libc_signal_block_all on sparc64
References: <20191205143526.27478-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
	<mvmlfrlahli.fsf@suse.de>
	<2c6ca3f8-e103-fbc4-d13d-05f646ef8e55@linaro.org>
	<mvmeexdaewe.fsf@suse.de>
	<38b8e5bb-d26a-5bf8-3293-0cb7bb8b98e4@linaro.org>
X-Yow: Everywhere I look I see NEGATIVITY and ASPHALT...
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 12:53:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <38b8e5bb-d26a-5bf8-3293-0cb7bb8b98e4@linaro.org> (Adhemerval
	Zanella's message of "Mon, 9 Dec 2019 09:24:06 -0300")
Message-ID: <mvma781acdz.fsf@suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00277.txt.bz2

On Dez 09 2019, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

> On 09/12/2019 08:59, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Dez 09 2019, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> 
>>> On 09/12/2019 08:00, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>>> On Dez 05 2019, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Where SIGALL_SET is defined as:
>>>>>
>>>>>   ((__sigset_t) { .__val = {[0 ...  _SIGSET_NWORDS-1 ] =  -1 } })
>>>>
>>>> Why is that not const?
>>>>
>>>> Andreas.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is on the updated version [1].
>> 
>> Does it help to make it const?
>> 
>
> It does, that's the main reason for the updated version

No, I mean without the other changes.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."