From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125346 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2017 14:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 125332 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2017 14:39:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.suse.de From: Andreas Schwab To: Joseph Myers Cc: Adhemerval Zanella , , Paul Eggert Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] posix: Consolidate glob implementation References: <1504643122-14874-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <1504643122-14874-8-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> X-Yow: Impudent.. Yet possessing a certain ALUMINUM SILICATE overbite....Needs REDDY-WHIP!! Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:39:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Joseph Myers's message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:28:57 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2 On Sep 12 2017, Joseph Myers wrote: > Does this mean we don't have any tests that verify a call to glob64 can be > linked (and works)? If so, such tests should be added (generally, all > non-compat symbols ought to be tested). It's a long standing bug that we don't verify the API. See the various incidences about missing symbols on some architectures. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."