From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69440 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2018 15:15:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 69373 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jan 2018 15:15:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:453 X-HELO: mx2.suse.de From: Andreas Schwab To: Florian Weimer Cc: GNU C Library , Torvald Riegel , "Dmitry V. Levin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement libc_once_retry for atomic initialization with allocation References: <6e4b6b22-3f38-f798-f2e0-eb22311ed6b5@redhat.com> X-Yow: I need to discuss BUY-BACK PROVISIONS with at least six studio SLEAZEBALLS!! Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <6e4b6b22-3f38-f798-f2e0-eb22311ed6b5@redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:09:43 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 On Jan 04 2018, Florian Weimer wrote: > + static inline struct foo * > + get_foo (void) > + { > + return __libc_once_retry (&global_foo, allocate_foo, free_foo, NULL); s/__// Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."