From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6763858D28 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:36:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org AB6763858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D627E1FE87; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:36:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1674743760; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ty4p6iQ6rVpXnT2rwY1lcWfoN0VwvmlY11D/8khVPp8=; b=uI9+7cxTGf69IiT7o7kN/wYgyppJaSLN/rmBLI9tlCCt+jPfCCo3L+aSw5PNZbPw5ibAzu BE+AYTVC+jnxhmCUGThBVzrP12TwxkDFWecq4hX+OrQ/6DpVT5DrjpKfynvkuEXBo0QCBR K2SjLFEa4wztFsCIztYBhkgc7GqJF9o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1674743760; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ty4p6iQ6rVpXnT2rwY1lcWfoN0VwvmlY11D/8khVPp8=; b=82UhS1DWYliShHDQb3MlU2r5dPVeegUK8OGmEYp7P4IDbrh0gb/J9SCglDyN+MftjShDFb NZwt5EBWLYN4kMCg== Received: from hawking.suse.de (unknown [10.168.4.11]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1632C141; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hawking.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 17005) id 8C41244384A; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:36:00 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use 64-bit time_t interfaces in strftime and strptime (bug 30053) References: <1d6daa89-fbec-461c-8423-eb785f89d4ab@linaro.org> X-Yow: PUNK ROCK!! DISCO DUCK!! BIRTH CONTROL!! Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:36:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Adhemerval Zanella Netto's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:25:27 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Jan 26 2023, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote: > I still think time/tst-y2038.c is somewhat confusing. It tests the Y2038 problem. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."