From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=6x9F=5X=suse.de=schwab@sourceware.org>
Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC2A03858D28
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:05:42 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BC2A03858D28
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de
Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134])
	by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B1D21E36;
	Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:05:41 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa;
	t=1674741941; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=Hbc+UoYC1kfqsqLOpfqs/EnOL9cvmcPigm75EDzVBso=;
	b=DWed6HfxI1PAK1KH03rC+A5qk1F3thNnZDlCv6W8TWZU01pJX0iFshwqI3pdsEgMdHAGlU
	xhNJrEoifLNECaiEiPFJb6s/PYrvSrGeXZtopgRTr6nT1I5ze99TW+LcJgItmL9UMaH2Cv
	wgEwQtlCbK9A17dMZplSe1BZqDo6+7E=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;
	s=susede2_ed25519; t=1674741941;
	h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=Hbc+UoYC1kfqsqLOpfqs/EnOL9cvmcPigm75EDzVBso=;
	b=DBl6qtCBA6+UkG7EvXT3ZzmS0lJt+d6V/42gi7Ka/yaAGmCxvGWbS9VU9TUwpIKylpChzv
	j3hAd1EnuRfGkADg==
Received: from hawking.suse.de (unknown [10.168.4.11])
	by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3A42C143;
	Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:05:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by hawking.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 17005)
	id A321644384A; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:05:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use 64-bit time_t interfaces in strftime and strptime
 (bug 30053)
References: <mvmr0vhto02.fsf@suse.de>
	<1d6daa89-fbec-461c-8423-eb785f89d4ab@linaro.org>
X-Yow: Thank god!!..  It's HENNY YOUNGMAN!!
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:05:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1d6daa89-fbec-461c-8423-eb785f89d4ab@linaro.org> (Adhemerval
	Zanella Netto's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:47:28 -0300")
Message-ID: <mvmmt65tmq5.fsf@suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

On Jan 26 2023, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote:

> I think it should be renamed to tst-strftime4-time64 to show it is testing
> strftime.

It also tests strptime.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."