From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 965713858C31 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:54:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 965713858C31 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8F71FDB6 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:54:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1679576079; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=0SV3ungUdp2H0RqyxguJ7IozuX407wYJRZ8Tqh2v8Ak=; b=JubALlR/MWNtFD9Rqlu13xn1vbIOGEB/rraFo4OUiK6It8B/DLrxWtWYxFBnNcgwUofSxd VGNxPt7ss53iDHf7mTQvcDASGyEmA6LeZKN/PJrDEBHzBvvPHdRcexzF/QK1yW1sMCvtVl mbuQ/HpcXnj4sc0gYBgkqgcjgxHpSfE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1679576079; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=0SV3ungUdp2H0RqyxguJ7IozuX407wYJRZ8Tqh2v8Ak=; b=Y/H3SKu/5Y+8hi5elid9kTf0JPtdST4qffvQrAYEuZwcjAB9TqBFzwWUlaynZEOjO9xXwj RzbDcKTLh7ExucCg== Received: from hawking.suse.de (unknown [10.168.4.11]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43CA2C141 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hawking.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 17005) id B1DF14A0358; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:54:39 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Side effect inside assert macro? X-Yow: I hope I bought the right relish... zzzzzzzzz... Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:54:39 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: In elf/dl-open.c there are two calls to _dl_debug_update inside the assert macro: 581: assert (_dl_debug_update (args->nsid)->r_state == RT_CONSISTENT); 930: assert (_dl_debug_update (args.nsid)->r_state == RT_CONSISTENT); Is it possible that these are the first calls of _dl_debug_update for this nsid? -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."