From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <schwab@suse.de>
Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2C43858D39
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:58:34 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9E2C43858D39
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de
Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134])
	by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD94322368;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:58:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa;
	t=1663581513; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=IRlCsqL9O4ucYaPna0WtJ4I/ytzqqpQrI3sE+9WY/mk=;
	b=j3nkoiNpEY36jrFreWldRYwZgsEWKGAbnjGL41edeDUtd/TmDNnHJp7njs1YorVcKb5cxk
	Zg1Lj6eMghrs2yTtoSAf5IRq3X3JalCw+0SIhGEeUCvm9TzqHv4OWaKEmKmlWO4z9WhFJO
	Nuwn30QOSTp/yEJsaP2e0sXEEIvzn7I=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de;
	s=susede2_ed25519; t=1663581513;
	h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=IRlCsqL9O4ucYaPna0WtJ4I/ytzqqpQrI3sE+9WY/mk=;
	b=wJvNhKpJ/F5XorPoGsAsAPIMUhesuvNdZGWUQn7iVgzTYTVHbSBMmcizE2xjY6EWaEmhaL
	GyuB08gVPtKrlFDQ==
Received: from hawking.suse.de (unknown [10.168.4.11])
	by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C4C2C141;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:58:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by hawking.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 17005)
	id 42B0E44021C; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:58:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux: Do not skip d_ino == 0 entries in readdir,
 readdir64 (bug 12165)
References: <87o7vbj1kz.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
	<mvmy1ufrcr5.fsf@suse.de> <87r107hil6.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
	<mvmtu53rbhe.fsf@suse.de> <878rmfhfsv.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
X-Yow: Did I SELL OUT yet??
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:58:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <878rmfhfsv.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's
	message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:30:40 +0200")
Message-ID: <mvmpmfrr8hj.fsf@suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

On Sep 19 2022, Florian Weimer wrote:

> What about this?
>
> 	  /* Linux may fail with ENOENT on some file systems if the
> 	     directory inode is marked as dead (deleted).  POSIX
> 	     treats this as a regular end-of-directory condition, so
> 	     do not set errno in that case, to indicate success.  */

Ok.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."