From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80171 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2016 14:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 80148 invoked by uid 89); 9 Nov 2016 14:50:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx2.suse.de From: Andreas Schwab To: Florian Weimer Cc: Joseph Myers , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Pending fixes for all-ABIs builds References: <35e9c513-c873-3d7e-38e4-6aa14e9ef245@redhat.com> <0a922f13-5130-51ca-fc73-6c003dbb20ce@redhat.com> X-Yow: I want another RE-WRITE on my CAESAR SALAD!! Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 14:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Florian Weimer's message of "Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:52:12 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2 On Nov 09 2016, Florian Weimer wrote: > Does this mean that if the application links against -ldl and invokes > dlopen, a different dynamic linker implementation is used? ??? There is only one dynamic linker, which is ld.so. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."