From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D25E3971432 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:35:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0D25E3971432 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,154,1610406000"; d="scan'208";a="372186149" Received: from tomate.loria.fr (HELO tomate) ([152.81.10.51]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2021 11:35:17 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:35:17 +0100 Message-Id: From: Paul Zimmermann To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: accuracy of mathematical functions X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:35:22 -0000 Hi, I have updated my comparison with the newly released 2.33 version. No big difference with the previous version, except that I included the "long double" format (aka ldbl-96), as suggested by Joseph Myers, for which the Intel Math library is uniformly better than all other libraries. https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/#accuracy Paul