public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
To: Shen-Ta Hsieh <ibmibmibm.tw@gmail.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, ibmibmibm.tw@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] x86_64: roundeven with sse4.1 support
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 06:52:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mwbl93mku6.fsf@tomate.loria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210522002227.2234377-2-ibmibmibm.tw@gmail.com> (message from Shen-Ta Hsieh via Libc-alpha on Sat, 22 May 2021 08:22:26 +0800)

       Dear Shen-Ta,

> Here is a benchmark result on my AMD Ryzen 9 3900X system:
> 
> * benchmark result before this commit
> |            |    roundeven |   roundevenf |
> |------------|--------------|--------------|
> | duration   |  3.77659e+09 |  3.77504e+09 |
> | iterations |  3.97043e+08 |  4.36752e+08 |
> | max        | 83.714       | 58.861       |
> | min        |  7.144       |  6.27        |
> | mean       |  9.51179     |  8.64345     |
> 
> * benchmark result after this commit
> |            |    roundeven |   roundevenf |
> |------------|--------------|--------------|
> | duration   |  3.76913e+09 |  3.76923e+09 |
> | iterations |  5.55921e+08 |  5.64822e+08 |
> | max        | 211.698      | 439.09       |
> | min        |  6.498       |  6.422       |
> | mean       |  6.77998     |  6.6733      |

I wonder why the max times have increased by a factor 2.5 and 7.5.
In my experiments I noticed that the "mean" time was quite stable,
while the "max" time could vary a lot between different runs. Thus
I usually run 5 times "make bench" and keep the smallest times:

$ ./testrun.sh benchtests/bench-roundeven

You can also try make USE_RDTSCP=1 bench (cf benchtests/README).

And it would be nice to have figures on another hardware (for example Intel).

Best regards,
Paul Zimmermann


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-22  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-22  0:22 [PATCH v6 1/3] math: redirect roundeven function Shen-Ta Hsieh
2021-05-22  0:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] x86_64: roundeven with sse4.1 support Shen-Ta Hsieh
2021-05-22  4:52   ` Paul Zimmermann [this message]
2021-05-23  0:41     ` 謝昇達(Shen-Ta Hsieh)
2021-05-23 16:14       ` Paul Zimmermann
2021-05-23 17:10   ` H.J. Lu
2021-05-23 17:12   ` Noah Goldstein
2021-05-22  0:22 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] Use GCC builtins for roundeven functions if desired Shen-Ta Hsieh
2021-05-23 19:03   ` H.J. Lu
2021-05-24  1:22     ` 謝昇達(Shen-Ta Hsieh)
2021-05-23 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] math: redirect roundeven function H.J. Lu
2021-05-24  1:39   ` 謝昇達(Shen-Ta Hsieh)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mwbl93mku6.fsf@tomate.loria.fr \
    --to=paul.zimmermann@inria.fr \
    --cc=ibmibmibm.tw@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).