* Re: [2/2] Avoid adding duplicated symbols into static libraries
@ 2021-03-02 18:03 Paul Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul Zimmermann @ 2021-03-02 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha
I checked that patch (42015 on patchwork) and indeed there are no more
duplicate symbols between libc.a and math/libm.a after this patch (tested
on x86_64) and all tests do pass.
If anybody else more fluent with the glibc internals could check this does
not break static builds, it would be nice. Otherwise I suggest to commit
this patch.
For reference we had those duplicate symbols before that patch:
__isinfl
__isnanl
__finitel
__copysignl
__modfl
__scalbnl
__frexpl
__signbitl
__ldexpl
__wrap_scalbnl
__isinf
__isnan
__finite
__copysign
__modf
__scalbn
__frexp
__signbit
__ldexp
__wrap_scalbn
__isinff
__isnanf
__finitef
__copysignf
__modff
__scalbnf
__frexpf
__signbitf
__ldexpf
__wrap_scalbnf
__isinff128
__isnanf128
__finitef128
__copysignf128
__modff128
__scalbnf128
__frexpf128
__signbitf128
__ldexpf128
__wrap_scalbnf128
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-03-02 18:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-02 18:03 [2/2] Avoid adding duplicated symbols into static libraries Paul Zimmermann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).