From: Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>
To: Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Locales: Thousands separator
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 06:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s9dlgb0yc3u.fsf@taka.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84160848.326497.1529613070136@poczta.nazwa.pl> (Rafal Luzynski's message of "Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:31:10 +0200 (CEST)")
Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> ããã¯ããã¾ãã:
> 21.06.2018 16:15 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> We could switch to NBSP, and just wait for the CLDR ticket to be
>> resolved, and then switch back to NNBSP and we would both match.
>>
>> The goal is to try harmonize this data across the various
>> implementations. There is nothing more frustrating for users
>> than to have different display data like this.
>>
>> Does that make sense?
>
> As I said previously, I will not object. But I have one suggestion:
> as the new ticket has been reported to CLDR let's wait few days
> and push our change just before the freeze which will be soon anyway.
> Just in case if CLDR responds "OK, NNBSP would be better" within
> those few days. I would like to avoid switching back and forth.
>
> I hope the change is as simple as "git revert", otherwise we may
> prepare a patch already and keep it around.
It looks like CLDR agrees that NNBSP is better:
https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/11217#no2
Status changed from new to accepted
Need to check that these are parse variants. Typographically the right
approach. For discussion.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>
ç¡ç ä¸è¶³ã¯ããä»äºã®æµã ã
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-27 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 8:11 Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 13:01 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-20 13:17 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 15:36 ` Mike FABIAN
2018-06-20 17:25 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 21:26 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-21 13:07 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-25 16:48 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 16:42 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-20 15:20 ` Stanislav Brabec
2018-06-20 15:52 ` Mike FABIAN
2019-12-04 16:57 ` Stanislav Brabec
2019-12-12 13:03 ` Marko Myllynen
2019-12-12 14:16 ` Stanislav Brabec
2019-12-12 15:16 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 22:42 ` Rafal Luzynski
2018-06-21 14:16 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-21 20:31 ` Rafal Luzynski
2018-06-27 6:31 ` Mike FABIAN [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s9dlgb0yc3u.fsf@taka.site \
--to=mfabian@redhat.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=digitalfreak@lingonborough.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).