From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16033833A07 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 18:45:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D16033833A07 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1670438723; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=aMwxiRBntGTmrRbHrAZE0mAykzjq37VKyQjN1V1B00w=; b=SViDge+VlH2VU864kPVj4VdGRbbRh94WEIcR1XEq88MCLPzKQbUDksj5GFegbtzdP6Ry5N c40oMbI+zyYi5V3CP/kEnevDR/cpP0eb7C3ywe3G/F5jx+R0GI18VcltIrRs34oZAdm3uy 3SSBSPu8cvl8tgj9H4S7UgZ357nBvzA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-617-tgHvS_gLNyuIGXcgpSqZOg-1; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 13:45:22 -0500 X-MC-Unique: tgHvS_gLNyuIGXcgpSqZOg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63A9101A528; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 18:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com (unknown [10.22.8.183]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99AD22027061; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 18:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2B7IjADn2020665; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 13:45:10 -0500 From: DJ Delorie To: Florian Weimer Cc: siddhesh@gotplt.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, zack@owlfolio.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Supporting malloc_usable_size In-Reply-To: <874ju7ilcc.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 13:45:10 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Florian Weimer writes: > DJ, what do you think? The world seems set against me to get rid of this API, so don't let me stop you. I just don't see the point, especially as other packages use it and will FTBFS when it's removed. Also, BSD provides this API too.