From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dj@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1933D385800D
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 21:10:35 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1933D385800D
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-592-qjDDC1IcPfCckQ48S6g36g-1; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:10:31 -0400
X-MC-Unique: qjDDC1IcPfCckQ48S6g36g-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.12])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9643F100C610;
 Wed, 14 Jul 2021 21:10:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-114-36.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.36])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6286A60C05;
 Wed, 14 Jul 2021 21:10:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16ELAPxS789480;
 Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:10:25 -0400
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Buildbot improvements
In-Reply-To: <5afdcee8-d5c5-9e7a-c7a5-4a9546393021@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:10:25 -0400
Message-ID: <xn35sgr48u.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 21:10:36 -0000

"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
> ... however, we could output a set of instructions that when used in
> a script could reconstitute the built container?

That's the "I can't guarantee the same contents as was built" case since
the underlying Fedora container might have changed.

But otherwise, yes.  You'd have to insert the right glibc git tree and
patch, but the container descriptions are tiny.