From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-74215-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 93695 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2016 20:51:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 93679 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2016 20:51:29 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:209
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] malloc: Use accessors for chunk metadata access
References: <06e061fc-47ad-8c0b-589f-e1a3f265e47d@redhat.com>
	<8c3b786c-f6ef-84a7-0fe2-3c6a66b15431@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:51:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <8c3b786c-f6ef-84a7-0fe2-3c6a66b15431@redhat.com> (Florian
	Weimer's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:39:13 +0200")
Message-ID: <xn37jgnqnm.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00575.txt.bz2


These comment changes are OK with me.  It makes me wonder if the wiki
page needs to note A=0 for its illustrations, like the source comments
now do.