From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dj@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23B62385841A
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Wed,  3 Nov 2021 03:15:28 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 23B62385841A
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-175-PSsYTdeBMYSQZDRk-aSHFw-1; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 23:15:26 -0400
X-MC-Unique: PSsYTdeBMYSQZDRk-aSHFw-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.12])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C95B10A8E00;
 Wed,  3 Nov 2021 03:15:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-112-194.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.194])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D16A60C04;
 Wed,  3 Nov 2021 03:15:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1A33FEFl2568680;
 Tue, 2 Nov 2021 23:15:14 -0400
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>
Cc: adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, carlos@redhat.com
Subject: Re: sbrk() failure while processing tunables
In-Reply-To: <ef688a14-9d35-6b4a-f3be-52570792f2ff@sourceware.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 23:15:14 -0400
Message-ID: <xn5yta7wvx.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 03:15:29 -0000

Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org> writes:
> That'll work only for the dynamic case, you'll need special code for 
> static linking then.  Alternatively, the rtld_malloc code looks 
> sufficiently independent that it could be split out into its own file 
> and included directly into dl-tunables.c.

That implies that statically linked executables would have two
independent malloc implementations...