From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B602838582A4 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 21:15:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B602838582A4 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1679087721; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=09hZRjQL9FkCxcT96i2/JbvMD9K6tb8JRf80ZEf0a1E=; b=DuMLqsRHk8CQBhvVTGfDKW0lF+V91vLx8yHLJo7zNFdrxeQGOtwylF6J8vFrtZONvmzreG mhFChO6xqz5MgaFQmJe8bLpifwygoUcIe25zzzWiBUHu2dX/qkHGzYGICqsnc00IamyPYI fQKykoWqK9ZXeOtKjtOj1zsnzNyykZo= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-592-VdSQSrwAMhed3f4DOU8a_g-1; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:15:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VdSQSrwAMhed3f4DOU8a_g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65416886464; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 21:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com (unknown [10.22.9.230]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 525EB1121325; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 21:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 32HLFG1i3647724; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:15:16 -0400 From: DJ Delorie To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch v2] aligned_alloc: conform to C17 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:15:16 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Alejandro Colomar writes: > BTW, I guess C11 was equivalent to C17 in this regard, or was this > changed in C17? C17 seems to be a "bugfix" for C11. In this case, one of the requirements for aligned_alloc() in C11 was, well, silly. It was removed in C17.