public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, alx@kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: manual: add syscall list appendix
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 13:55:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xncyplabgj.fsf@greed.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8a79837-bea3-4351-a5a0-e4f95c7c0a95@redhat.com> (carlos@redhat.com)

"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
> This needs a configure argument to specify which version of the Linux man-pages project
> release is the version we've looked at to make sure we match the behaviour for the
> specified syscalls.
>
> I think we should specifically reference e.g. Linux man-pages X.Y.

Can we make that optional?  I.e. if *no* configure option is specified,
the wording is version-agnostic?  Development in git likely doesn't care
which version of man-pages is current, and it would be continuously
changing anyway.  We would only need to lock-step in released versions
of glibc, and then, we'd need to hard-code it somewhere as a default.

> What about syscalls that have cancellation?
>
> We should really split them out and document that we wrap them in special cancellation
> code (which will change a bit as I need to review Adhemerval's changes for that).

I'll see what I can do ;-)

> The intent is to say that if we didn't document anything in the glibc manual
> that users should feel free to go read the Linux man-pages documentaiton for
> that syscall.
>
> Thoughts?

It's long for an appendix.  Do we have a chapter on cancellation?  Do we
want to be that Linux-centric?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-16 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-15 20:52 DJ Delorie
2024-05-16  5:02 ` Florian Weimer
2024-05-16 11:44   ` Carlos O'Donell
2024-05-16 12:06     ` Florian Weimer
2024-05-16 13:37     ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-16 14:52       ` Carlos O'Donell
2024-05-16 15:03         ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-16 17:57       ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-16 17:55     ` DJ Delorie [this message]
2024-05-16 21:08       ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-17 13:21       ` Carlos O'Donell
2024-05-17 15:31         ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-17 19:16           ` Carlos O'Donell
2024-05-20 21:43             ` [patch v2] manual: add syscall list DJ Delorie
2024-05-20 22:10               ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-21  1:12                 ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-21 10:22                   ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-21 17:16                     ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-21 20:04                 ` [patch v3] " DJ Delorie
2024-05-22 19:07                   ` Carlos O'Donell
2024-05-22 19:40                     ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-22 19:41                     ` [patch v4] " DJ Delorie
2024-05-22 19:42                       ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-22 20:54                       ` Florian Weimer
2024-05-22 21:00                         ` Florian Weimer
2024-05-22 21:26                         ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-23  7:31                           ` Florian Weimer
2024-05-23  8:49                             ` Andreas Schwab
2024-05-22 22:45                       ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-22 23:12                       ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-23 16:59                       ` Zack Weinberg
2024-05-23 19:38                         ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-23 19:41                           ` Zack Weinberg
2024-05-23 19:46                             ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-23 19:51                             ` Joseph Myers
2024-05-23 21:18                         ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-16 17:37   ` manual: add syscall list appendix DJ Delorie
2024-05-16 17:55     ` Joe Simmons-Talbott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xncyplabgj.fsf@greed.delorie.com \
    --to=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).