From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2AE3858C83 for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 19:10:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EC2AE3858C83 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684264209; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=B0Tf9csRimAm6g/Z5PMjveV4BUPHyQ0bt/UqHXUgL9A=; b=PVFAAByHG8FkgBtK1KtgqBEdLciTXFTYVk/NI1wsAySK1N8PzH30XstlZIhGG3E+b32mhK rOf4q8FAKODZAU/rO6Vrc4dCqShdgFXxx/uFncEwQ4fAs5yzfMwfb5eAvQIZMto92F1QQF SGx9eeX2JQDdcdTnLwvD/SKphj+XShI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-54-PFpqqbX7O_qmwltoRHCjxA-1; Tue, 16 May 2023 15:10:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: PFpqqbX7O_qmwltoRHCjxA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A6E86C60F; Tue, 16 May 2023 19:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com (unknown [10.22.9.151]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5FE92026D3C; Tue, 16 May 2023 19:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 34GJA6sR3311449; Tue, 16 May 2023 15:10:06 -0400 From: DJ Delorie To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i386: Use pthread_barrier for synchronization on tst-bz21269 In-Reply-To: <5a3f6747-c39e-506e-eccd-88d71a6418f9@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 15:10:06 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Adhemerval Zanella Netto writes: >> 1> Adhemerval's v4 patch >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-February/145934.html >> 2> DJ's v3 patch >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-March/145999.html >> 3> remove the test >> >> Which option were you agreeing to, and do you still agree to it? >> > > Either 2 or 3 is fine for me, since I acked your patch I think we can > go with 2 for now. I pushed #2. Next time we have a problem with that test, we'll just remove it.