From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63F03858C30 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 03:43:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E63F03858C30 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1677123839; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=RA3iVR2i0GBtOMU40ISG0EewIx+N/rK4Vj1BpWUNKXQ=; b=epJ6Sq6BZ9I57U28fR+j69f3qXy7XZ6ObU6pn3x5wLhBd/wjTRxJ2v8SUM6kmY9ZNUe0Fw p3QKeRQI2oYRKJonw9hMp2KdvSdWko1wZQMGbsaN7uhJ8+/D8j0IwWUeTRRjSoz7exqZ6x UWDdnoB0pTQDTX2aMIyYEkFqXeK8f0E= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-320-lPbtCSj_PwKwwlD8VWsDuQ-1; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 22:43:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: lPbtCSj_PwKwwlD8VWsDuQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B79980D0EE; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 03:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com (unknown [10.22.8.35]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C704492B04; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 03:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 31N3hu3S1073487; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 22:43:56 -0500 From: DJ Delorie To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, carlos@redhat.com, fweimer@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86-64: Add glibc.cpu.prefer_map_32bit_exec [BZ #28656] In-Reply-To: <20230221215259.86835-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 22:43:56 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" writes: > +When this tunable is set to \code{1}, shared libraries of non-setuid ./tunables.texi:592: misplaced { ./tunables.texi:592: misplaced } Should that be @code{1} ?