From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dj@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33DE384240B
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:09:35 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A33DE384240B
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-48-ynsmOsuAM9OkQlHEITrOzQ-1; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:09:33 -0500
X-MC-Unique: ynsmOsuAM9OkQlHEITrOzQ-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.11])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C7E5B372;
 Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:09:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-114-77.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.77])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082EF1894E;
 Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:09:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by greed.delorie.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10T69VPV008933;
 Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:09:31 -0500
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Newer hwcap failures
In-Reply-To: <878s8c1e1v.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (message from Florian
 Weimer on Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:56:44 +0100)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:09:31 -0500
Message-ID: <xnim7gff50.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:09:36 -0000

Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:
> It's probably a left-over from an earlier non-destructive test in the
> scenarios that are working.

> If so, this is what the postclean flag is for ;-)

To be clearer, I meant, any test that leaves behind an ld.so.cache (or
anything that may affect future tests) should postclean (just in case)
but a test that is sensitive to ld.so.cache should also do a preclean.

This scenario is why I put those features in there.