From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=5XXM=7C=redhat.com=dj@sourceware.org>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DD83858C5E
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 05:10:27 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 01DD83858C5E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1678425027;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=/k2NCKKTDwGCpO1+es6tkHrX/+V6GNSD6hDhmLEnx2E=;
	b=aYrwsmglgbhBOx+RPHfKLtEzMZv5O+lGa5q4aL9pspcSpTJVCU02eGbAIXgsQ54eN1s1Td
	+llFNvrbP2zRE8L7Pmrfd4t6lZ/8g/X8g4RpqZ6bH7yr1lak75e18Mp09F36054IkrwfC5
	ov+w7AjtZMSqQ/u+Pub3cDYr/5HAa6Q=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-482-hPoNhQArPHekEb1vBmMgPw-1; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 00:10:26 -0500
X-MC-Unique: hPoNhQArPHekEb1vBmMgPw-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00E885A588;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2023 05:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com (unknown [10.22.9.14])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66AA2166B26;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2023 05:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 32A5APv93280355;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2023 00:10:25 -0500
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com
Subject: Re: x86: Don't check PREFETCHWT1 in tst-cpu-features-cpuinfo.c
In-Reply-To: <CAFUsyfK8orSvJuxQzfr_4MbKhk7_0HBpy3h_vucPggL=_jeJYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 00:10:25 -0500
Message-ID: <xno7p142f2.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> writes:
> Does platform/x86.h need to be updated as well? Although that might be harder
> to change as its user facing.

I'm not taking support for that bit out of glibc, just tweaking the
consistency check to not care that the kernel doesn't report it in
/proc/cpuinfo yet.