From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-91583-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 117540 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2018 15:14:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 117512 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2018 15:14:27 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:325
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, libc-stable@sourceware.org, andrew@sifive.com,
        darius@bluespec.com, palmer@dabbelt.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.27] RISC-V: fix struct kernel_sigaction to match the
 kernel version [BZ #23069]
In-Reply-To: <20180417142044.GA3216@aurel32.net> (message from Aurelien Jarno on Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:20:44 +0200)
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:14:00 -0000
Message-ID: <xno9ih7tm9.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2


Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> writes:
> So it seems more risky to me.

I agree.

> Also note that this is not an installed header, but just a compile
> time header.

So no user-visible ABI change, good.  Ok with me then :-)