From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 73856 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2016 17:51:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 73829 invoked by uid 89); 26 Oct 2016 17:51:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com From: DJ Delorie To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Static inline functions for mallopt helpers References: <1477320168-23397-1-git-send-email-siddhesh@sourceware.org> <1477320168-23397-2-git-send-email-siddhesh@sourceware.org> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1477320168-23397-2-git-send-email-siddhesh@sourceware.org> (Siddhesh Poyarekar's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:12:43 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00468.txt.bz2 - /* Forbid setting the threshold too high. */ This comment got lost. It would be nice if the functions were in the same order as the cases in the switch statement. Otherwise OK.