From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dj@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57A063858405
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:58:06 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 57A063858405
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-434-wzOAFdxlPteZ_CoEZBA6UQ-1; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:58:04 -0500
X-MC-Unique: wzOAFdxlPteZ_CoEZBA6UQ-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E812F1923761
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:58:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-112-96.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.96])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBBE65C1A1;
 Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:58:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AFKw2Aa2910297;
 Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:58:02 -0500
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch v1] Allow for unpriviledged nested containers
In-Reply-To: <87sfw1qz3q.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:58:02 -0500
Message-ID: <xnpmr13zmt.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:58:07 -0000


Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:
> * DJ Delorie:
>> Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:
>>> Have you tried a bind mount of the existing /proc into the chroot (from
>>> the outside of that chroot)?
>>
>> That's an interesting idea, but the directory it (and /sys, /dev, etc,
>> eventually, I suppose) needs to be mounted on doesn't exist until we're
>> late into "make check" and rsync'ing the pristine test container to the
>> working test container.  And we delete and rebuild that container as
>> needed.  It would be a lot of messy logic to pre-mount that.
>
> Huh.  We already do this for various parts of /dev.

Ah, I thought you meant "outside of the podman container".  Testing...