public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/11] malloc hooks removal
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 19:24:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xnsfxbw14u.fsf@greed.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAfxs77aCjBHRZVC+U3-zs0PPdm5XDB9P-aJNwCcPiuO4tdOjw@mail.gmail.com>

Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> writes:
> Is the issue in malloc/malloc-debug.c?  There is a big if for
> GLIBC_2_0 -> GLIBC_2_34.
> It seems from GLIBC_2_35 nothing is available any longer.  Is that
> correct, that is what is happening.

Yes.  Old ports get compatibility symbols that do nothing.  New ports
get no symbols since there are no old apps that would have been linked
against them.

If yours is the first new port since we made this change, there might be
some debugging needed...


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-08 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19 18:46 Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] Make mcheck tests conditional on GLIBC_2.23 or earlier Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-22 12:26   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] Remove __after_morecore_hook Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] Remove __morecore and __default_morecore Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] Move malloc hooks into a compat DSO Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-22 12:25   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] mcheck: Wean away from malloc hooks [BZ #23489] Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-22 19:57   ` Matheus Castanho
2021-07-23  2:25     ` [PATCH] Fix build and tests with --disable-tunables Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-23  4:55       ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] Simplify __malloc_initialized Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] mtrace: Wean away from malloc hooks Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] glibc.malloc.check: " Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-22 12:25   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] Move malloc_{g,s}et_state to libc_malloc_debug Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-22 12:25   ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] Remove malloc hooks [BZ #23328] Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-19 18:46 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] mcheck Fix malloc_usable_size [BZ #22057] Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-21  9:45 ` [PATCH v10 00/11] malloc hooks removal Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-10-08 21:47 ` Stafford Horne
2021-10-08 22:22   ` DJ Delorie
2021-10-08 23:18     ` Stafford Horne
2021-10-08 23:24       ` DJ Delorie [this message]
2021-10-08 23:29         ` Stafford Horne
2021-10-08 23:48           ` Stafford Horne
2021-10-11  2:40             ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-10-11  1:55   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-10-11  2:19     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xnsfxbw14u.fsf@greed.delorie.com \
    --to=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).