On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 09:41, David Mosberger wrote:

> It seems to me that on ia64, MEMORY_BARRIER should expand into:
> 
> 	asm volatile ("mf" ::: "memory")

Yes, and I've added an appropriate change.  I'm not entirely clear how
the mf.a form comes into play.  We have separate READ_MEMORY_BARRIER and
WRITE_MEMORY_BARRIER macros and mf.a might fit for one of them.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------