From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-6251-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28348 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2003 21:12:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25514 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 21:10:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta07-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.47)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 20 Feb 2003 21:10:38 -0000
Received: from kc.cam.armlinux.org ([81.96.69.239])
          by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20030220211036.WVND3191.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@kc.cam.armlinux.org>;
          Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:10:36 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by kc.cam.armlinux.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18lxxf-0000Qj-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:10:31 +0000
Subject: Re: architecture status, please
From: Philip Blundell <Philip.Blundell@pobox.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <3E540803.3060703@redhat.com>
References: <3E540803.3060703@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1045775431.1112.27.camel@kc.cam.armlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:12:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2

On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 22:41, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I think things have stablelized now and we can think about 2.3.2.  Do
> all architectures which worked in 2.3.1 work now?  Are any other
> architectures which didn't work in 2.3.1 close to working with the
> current tree?

With the sysdep.h patch I sent earlier, Arm seems to be working at least
as well as it did in 2.3.1.  "make check" passes with no errors other
than the normal ones relating to floating point.

p.