From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28168 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2008 08:04:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 28143 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2008 08:04:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate3.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:04:10 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate3.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2A847RV139004 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:04:07 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2A847oI2052180 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:04:07 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2A847D5030048 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:04:07 +0100 Received: from [9.152.198.54] (dyn-9-152-198-54.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.198.54]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2A847V8030042; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:04:07 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: Remove PT_IEEE_IP ptrace calls. From: Martin Schwidefsky Reply-To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com To: Roland McGrath Cc: Glibc hackers In-Reply-To: <20080307185837.523B827010F@magilla.localdomain> References: <1204908023.21438.8.camel@localhost> <20080307185837.523B827010F@magilla.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:04:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1205136243.23606.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 10:58 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > If you aren't worried about any compatibility issue for s390, we surely aren't. > I assume you've checked with both users. ;-) Compatibility issues for a field that does not contain the value it should contain? It can't get more broken than it is today, all the major distribution versions have a kernel that null the field. So I am not worried about compatibility. In fact I am quite happy that we can remove this nasty ptrace hack in fesetenv/fegetenv. It even showed up on some benchmarks. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.