From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11083 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2002 22:10:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11065 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2002 22:10:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO deimos.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.19.190) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2002 22:10:44 -0000 Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33]) by deimos.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id OAA03610; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:10:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123]) by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.10.2/8.10.2 HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id gA7MAgL27967; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1]) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id gA7MAgHW023073; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:10:42 -0800 Received: (from davidm@localhost) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id gA7MAfLH023069; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:10:41 -0800 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15818.58593.831718.648490@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:10:00 -0000 To: Roland McGrath Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com, hjl@lucon.org Subject: Re: patch to make init_array work (2nd version; resend) In-Reply-To: <200211072158.gA7Lwqu29021@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <15818.57443.807212.759018@napali.hpl.hp.com> <200211072158.gA7Lwqu29021@magilla.sf.frob.com> Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 >>>>> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:58:52 -0800, Roland McGrath said: Roland> That seems like a reasonable thing to do, though it's Roland> unfortunate it means changing all the platforms' start.S Roland> files. Yes. Roland> For preinit_array+init_array, start.S could just contain the Roland> code in the .init section, no? Perhaps, but it would defeat the whole purpose of switching to init_array (see my previous mail about why any call in .init/.fini causes incorrect unwind info). --david