From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-5810-listarch-libc-hacker=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24993 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2002 22:38:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24959 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2002 22:38:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO deimos.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.19.190)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2002 22:38:39 -0000
Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33])
	by deimos.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id OAA06322;
	Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:38:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123])
	by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.10.2/8.10.2 HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id gA7MccL29697;
	Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1])
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id gA7MccHW023409;
	Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:38:38 -0800
Received: (from davidm@localhost)
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id gA7McbLY023403;
	Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:38:37 -0800
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15818.60269.685537.688317@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:38:00 -0000
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com, hjl@lucon.org
Subject: Re: patch to make init_array work (2nd version; resend)
In-Reply-To: <200211072229.gA7MTOY29236@magilla.sf.frob.com>
References: <15818.58593.831718.648490@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	<200211072229.gA7MTOY29236@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2

>>>>> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:29:24 -0800, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> said:

  >> Perhaps, but it would defeat the whole purpose of switching to
  >> init_array (see my previous mail about why any call in
  >> .init/.fini causes incorrect unwind info).

  Roland> Since this part of the section is generated normally along
  Roland> with the prologue, I would think that its unwind info would
  Roland> come out normally too.

For .init, wouldn't the new code have to go into the epilogue to
ensure that the .init_array entries are called after .init?

	--david