From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-6122-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22298 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 19:45:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22261 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 19:45:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO deimos.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.19.190)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 23 Jan 2003 19:45:29 -0000
Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33])
	by deimos.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id LAA12024;
	Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123])
	by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.10.2/8.10.2 HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id h0NJjQK04949;
	Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1])
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id h0NJjQZw025910;
	Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:45:26 -0800
Received: (from davidm@localhost)
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id h0NJjQ1Z025906;
	Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:45:26 -0800
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <15920.18006.383327.719985@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:45:00 -0000
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Crash in DT_FINI_ARRAY
In-Reply-To: <jer8b4qaij.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
References: <jer8b4qaij.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2

What platform did it crash on?  I'm sure I tested it on ia64 and it
worked fine, there (at least it got through the test-suite without
visible errors).

	--david

>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:08:20 +0100, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> s=
aid:

  Andreas> The pointers in DT_FINI_ARRAY are already relocated.
  Andreas> Andreas.

  Andreas> 2003-01-23 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>

  Andreas> 	* elf/dl-close.c (_dl_close): Don't relocate
  Andreas> DT_FINI_ARRAY elements.

  Andreas> --- elf/dl-close.c.~1.93.~ 2003-01-16 11:19:32.000000000
  Andreas> +0100 +++ elf/dl-close.c 2003-01-22 21:11:29.000000000
  Andreas> +0100 @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ _dl_close (void *_map) unsigned
  Andreas> int cnt;
=20
  Andreas>  		  for (cnt =3D 0; cnt < sz; ++cnt) - ((fini_t)
  Andreas> (imap->l_addr + array[cnt])) (); + ((fini_t) array[cnt])
  Andreas> (); }
=20
  Andreas>  	      /* Next try the old-style destructor.  */

  Andreas> -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG,
  Andreas> Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 N=FCrnberg Key fingerprint =3D
  Andreas> 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now
  Andreas> for something completely different."