From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-6921-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20572 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2003 21:58:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20554 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2003 21:58:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO palrel13.hp.com) (156.153.255.238)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2003 21:58:47 -0000
Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33])
	by palrel13.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D2C301C027A7; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:58:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123])
	by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id hADLwjwU019923;
	Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:58:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1])
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hADLwjFO019213;
	Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:58:45 -0800
Received: (from davidm@localhost)
	by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id hADLwi7q019209;
	Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:58:44 -0800
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16307.65172.598659.322426@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:58:00 -0000
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: new syscall stub support for ia64 libc
In-Reply-To: <20031113193817.GZ12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <20031031084249.GA30446@twiddle.net>
	<20031031070114.GV12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
	<16290.37282.439025.287911@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	<20031031144724.GY12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
	<16306.47596.371542.356256@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	<16307.13167.262943.505720@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	<3FB34C1E.3040209@redhat.com>
	<16307.49081.857428.105026@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	<3FB3C3F9.1040303@redhat.com>
	<16307.63701.892766.879074@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	<20031113193817.GZ12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/
X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2

>>>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:38:17 +0100, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> said:
  Jakub> Shouldn't this be:

Does it make a difference in practice?  AFAIK, PT_LOAD is the first
program header in the kernel DSO and that's unlikely to change.  But
yes, your version covers a wider range of possibilities.

	--david