From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15661 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2003 22:22:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15609 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 22:22:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO palrel12.hp.com) (156.153.255.237) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 22:22:15 -0000 Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33]) by palrel12.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014901C02296; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:22:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123]) by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id hB8MMDln029290; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:22:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1]) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hB8MMDFO023630; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:22:13 -0800 Received: (from davidm@localhost) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id hB8MMCwQ023626; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:22:12 -0800 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16340.63892.855509.31628@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 22:22:00 -0000 To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: unwind failures due to __pthread_initialize_minimal In-Reply-To: <3FD4CD71.4080500@redhat.com> References: <3FBBFD24.6080005@redhat.com> <200311192354.hAJNsnoQ024060@magilla.sf.frob.com> <16316.2877.817143.766426@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FBC2621.7050007@redhat.com> <16316.15531.264581.982950@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FD28335.1000702@redhat.com> <16340.46987.943764.530136@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FD4CD71.4080500@redhat.com> Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 >>>>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 11:13:53 -0800, Ulrich Drepper said: Uli> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Uli> Hash: SHA1 Uli> David Mosberger wrote: >> It will mean, however, that the new syscall-stub patch will conflict >> with this change (I thought you had ignored this previous patch). Do >> I need to send an updated syscall-stub patch? Uli> Would be good. But I'm nevertheless waiting until Jakub has analyzed Uli> the situation of the stock gcc. OK, that's fine. As long as i know that it's being worked on. I'll wait to hear from Jakub before making a new patch, then. --david