From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8260 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2003 19:29:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8243 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2003 19:29:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO palrel13.hp.com) (156.153.255.238) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2003 19:29:50 -0000 Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33]) by palrel13.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB471C019AF; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:29:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123]) by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id hBBJTm4P010861; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:29:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali [127.0.0.1]) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hBBJTmFO027416; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:29:48 -0800 Received: (from davidm@localhost) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id hBBJTi33027411; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:29:44 -0800 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16344.50600.834349.826836@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:29:00 -0000 To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Ulrich Drepper , davidm@hpl.hp.com, libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: ia64 clock_gettime and HP_TIMING In-Reply-To: References: <16306.21333.78785.923547@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <3FB2751B.9010302@redhat.com> <3FB34B5A.2040209@redhat.com> <16308.3006.52067.235699@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FB515DC.9010909@redhat.com> <3FD7AABA.9040809@redhat.com> Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 >>>>> On 11 Dec 2003 05:43:50 -0500, Jes Sorensen said: Jes> I might be confused so feel free to correct me if I misread it Jes> again. I also concluded that the code is _probably_ correct but that it's exceptionally hard to follow it. It's full of double negations! Perhaps that could be improved? --david